Comment on [deleted]
nodsocket@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is a nothing burger. Even the gyroscope is a greater privacy threat than a light sensor.
Comment on [deleted]
nodsocket@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is a nothing burger. Even the gyroscope is a greater privacy threat than a light sensor.
MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s IEEE misinterpreting the guys original paper.
liuyang12.github.io/proj/privacy_dual_imaging/ (can’t find the full paper, but here’s the abstract at least)
The paper author straight up says the light sensor is impractical to use as an attack vector, but when you use it in conjunction with other sensors you might be able to gleam more information than most might think. It leaves me with question of what other sensors can you combine to start getting behavioral information that is a security threat?
I’ll say it worked for me. I read the IEEE headline, called bullshit, dug into it and yeah you can only get a tiny bit of information that you have to stretch pretty far to get useful conclusions from… But it’s more than the zero I initially thought. So props to the paper author, he met his goal. IEEE wanted sensationalized clicks, which they too unfortunately got.