Comment on Teen deepfake victim pushes for federal law targeting AI-generated explicit content

• Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Ahhhh, fine. It’s reasonable to say that people ought to have rights over their own likeness? So if you’re walking down the street and someone’s recording you, what? You melt down over your likeness? Hide in your house for fear that someone will take a picture of you?

  source

  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Don’t you know? People already do have rights over their likeness and we already have laws regarding that. To some extent you are allowed to record public locations and events, and you don’t need to seek permission to every passerby. But it doesn’t mean you can record people and use their images in every location and situation.

    Not to mention, we are talking about deepfakes made to look like specific people. I don’t think you are going to accidentally pass by someone’s deepfake porn while taking selfies on the streets, so there’s not much point of bringing this up.

    source

    • Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So someone is gonna tell you when they use your picture/ video for their personal use?? Lol bro

      source

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Which is why the proposed bill targets distributors.

        You talk about it as if you never seen laws that apply to the internet before.

        source