Comment on Meta admits using pirated books to train AI, but won't pay for it
TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 months agoNo that is relevant, however I would still argue that a paper without enough data to replicate their work (ie releasing the code of their LLM) isn’t really anything that should qualify as research. The whole point of academia is that someone else verifies your work - or rather, they try to prove you wrong.
tinwhiskers@lemmy.world 5 months ago
They have released it on github. The code is only about 500 lines.
TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Yeah I mean what they’ve released is essentially the design of the battery and starter system, without the design of the actual motor. You can’t replicate their product and prove their work with what they’ve published.