Or, you know, you could do both :o
Yeah, because thumbs up and down has never ever led to shitty content.
Highlighting actual experts is a far better system.
narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 1 year ago
stoly@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lol yet here you are participating in a system that you apparently think is shitty lol
LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Am I asking you for medical advice? Strange. I thought I was reading 90% shit posts.
stoly@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And here I am reading troll posts. Too bad.
rab@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I mean you can still see dislikes with the browser extension, can you link even a single video that’s “shitty content” that doesn’t have a ton of dislikes?
People aren’t stupid and like/dislike is a good system
LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So like, were you actually living in an isolated Afghanistan cave in the first year (fuck even now) of COVID?
rab@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
We should have some faith in our official institution but were all human. If anything being an expert can make people more prone to serious mistakes because of bias.
Its in everyone interested for the public to speak up fast if official information is wrong or dangerous.
The downvote thing is an old issue though. I actually see many other problems but believe it will still end up a net plus.
My main concern is who choses the expert? Will it be a local one? in the users own language? Or will YouTube hire their own experts to make these videos themselves.
What do they do if doctors cant agree on a best method but multiple methods have videos online?