Comment on Microsoft, OpenAI sued for copyright infringement by nonfiction book authors in class action claim

• General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Huh. Obviously, you don’t believe that a copyleft license should trump other licenses (or lack thereof). So, what are you hoping this to achieve?

  source

  • grue@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Obviously, you don’t believe that a copyleft license should trump other licenses (or lack thereof)

    I’m not sure what you mean. No licenses “trump” any other license; that’s not how it works. You can only make something that’s a derivative work of multiple differently-licensed things if the terms of all the licenses allow it, something the FSF calls “compatibility.” Obviously, a proprietary license can never be compatible with a copyleft one, so what I’m hoping to achieve is a ruling that says any AI whose training dataset included both copyleft and proprietary items has completely legally-unusable output. (And also that any AI whose training dataset includes copyleft items along with permissively-licensed and public domain ones must have its output be copyleft.)

    source

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes, but what do you hope to achieve by that?

      source