Comment on Japan determines copyright doesn't apply to LLM/ML training data
tabular@lemmy.world 10 months agoTo be at fault the user would have to know the AI creation they distributed commits copyright infringement. How can you tell? Is everyone doing months of research into every creative works to make sure it’s not somewhat like someone else’s?
Even if you had an AI trained on only public domain assets you could still end up putting in the words that generate something copyrighted, and not know.
Companies created a random copyright infringement tool and users randomly infringe copyright.
red@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
The same way you can tell if you repainted a Banksy yourself. If you don’t realize, and monetize, then you are liable for a copyright lawsuit regardless of the wat you created the piece in question.
tabular@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You may recognize a Banksy but to another it’s like I said you aught to know your work is like one from Coinsey: who?
This is exasperated when people can create creative works via AK, having even less knowledge about your peers who know how to DIY. A potentially life-ruining lawsuit is a bad system to find out you can’t monetize something.
red@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
If only there was some way to find out prior to selling stuff as if you made it. If only. Darn it!
tabular@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I don’t understand. If I make something that doesn’t mean I’m not infringing someone’s works.