Did you not read my comment? Users opt in to sharing data with other accounts, which means if one account is compromised, then every account that allowed them access would have their data compromised too. That’s not on the company, because they feature can’t work without allowing access.
Comment on 23andMe tells victims it's their fault that their data was breached | TechCrunch
rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 months ago23andMe is responsible for sandboxing that data, however. Which they obviously didn’t do.
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 10 months ago
stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 months ago
User opted-in to share those data
rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You opt in to share your data with Facebook. Would you still consider it an issue if your data was breached because someone else’s account was hacked?
stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 months ago
I would consider normal that my photos that I only share with some people were leaked if one of those people’s accounts got hacked.
jimbo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Sure, it’s a breach, but I would blame my idiot friend for re-using passwords. I wouldn’t blame the service for doing exactly what I expected the service to do, and is the reason I chose to use the service in the first place.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
If you share your nudes with the “friends only” privacy settings on facebook, and someone else accesses one of your friends accounts because they reused their password and proceeds to leak those photos, is it the fault of Facebook, your friend, the person leaking them, or you?
Because that is exactly what happened here. Credit stuffing reused passwords and scraping opt-in “friends only” shared data.
rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Private health data was compromised as well, on a smaller scale. It doesn’t make sense to blame users for a security breach of a corporation, literally ever. That’s my point. The friend was dumb, and you shared something maybe you shouldn’t have. But that doesn’t also absolve the company of poor security practices. I very strongly doubt that 14,000 people knew or consciously chose to directly share with a collective 7 million people.