Comment on 41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!!
voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Could somebody explain what “fedipact” means?
Comment on 41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!!
voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Could somebody explain what “fedipact” means?
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 11 months ago
An organized group of fediverse admins all united at not federating with Meta, i.e. against federation and also united in this goal
fedipact.online
Ilandar@aussie.zone 11 months ago
You should know that list isn’t entirely accurate. My instance is listed despite the owner never having signed the petition and remaining undecided.
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Thanks for the heads up!
chitak166@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That sounds toxic af.
tal@lemmy.today 11 months ago
I mean, groups glomming up to push particular ideas or concerns are probably part and parcel of having a federated network with people independently operating servers. Various people are going to have various views on content. Some Usenet servers wouldn’t forward content of particular types and all that.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_Is_No_Cabal
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backbone_cabal
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That’s just organization of independent actors wishing to push a message together. In a way, it is beautiful. I wish it wouldn’t be message to defend and block and close out, but that’s the current realities and worries of the Fedi.