I’m in the same boat. I also work as a mentor for people going through a computing apprenticeship scheme, where they work part-time at a big tech company for 3-4 years, and then have the opportunity to join as an entry-level engineer.
One of the big things people don’t talk about as much in software engineering is imposter syndrome. It’s very high amongst those with great academic achievements, so imagine for a second what it’s like if you’re self-taught! Many bootcamps and apprenticeship schemes cover the hard skills aspect, but the theory behind everything can be extremely important, even when it’s not immediately obvious.
I agree with your points, and I’d say that adding everything else on top often makes getting a degree a no-brainer IMO. Obviously, it’s expensive and time-consuming, but it gives you dedicated time to learn, ticks the inevitable box that many HR departments put in front of big tech job ads, and most importantly gives you a non-trivial task that you can point towards as proof of you belonging.
lysdexic@programming.dev 11 months ago
The only time I had to brush up on data structures and algorithms is when I apply to job ads, and recruiters put up bullshit ladder-pulling trivia questions to pass to the next stage of a recruiting process. It’s astonishing how the usefulness of a whole body of knowledge is to feed gatekeepers with trivia questions.
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Absolutely. I generally find any kind of analogous coding tasks - leetcoder style or otherwise - to be a huge waste of time.
It tells you significantly less than a 30 minute conversation will. Someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about will out themselves quickly when you get into the nitty gritty of the full software delivery lifecycle.