Comment on Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"

• Patches@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • schmidtster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You would be in the minority, piracy can increase sales because a lot of people see the value after the trial period and pay for it.

    Linky for source of one company.

    source

    • dpkonofa@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Did you even read your own article?

      "That’s really awesome for an indie dev; a few thousand bucks is nothing to shy away from and can get them going on their next project. I do believe it gave them a boost, but this is very much a PR headline rather than an exponential overnight success.”

      “While they successfully moved the needle and made a PR splash, this is not a sustainable approach,” Laborde said. “It reinforces a mentality that art ‘should be free’ and ultimately devalues their work over time. This works as a one-time attention grabber and audience-expander, but I can’t recommend it long term.”

      It did not increase sales. They couldn’t even attribute it to sales.

      Such a significant increase in sales certainly sounds impressive, but for Nicholas Laborde, founder and executive producer of Raconteur Games, the numbers should be taken with a grain of salt.

      source

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I did

        In fact, encouraging piracy has been practiced for many years now, with a handful of devs embracing it as a valuable marketing tool. For Laborde, though, this is no longer a viable strategy.

        There’s hyperlinks in the article in that section with other sources. I can’t hold your hand here, the piece is also a little op-ed too, of course the writer is going to have a bias. Especially when they imply they’ve used it or know its benefits previously.

        source
    • Patches@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      [deleted]

      source

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Do you mind not sensationalizing the quote?

        Actual text below

        “With only 10 reviews on Steam, saying a 400% sales increase is an eye-catcher for sure but not necessarily as huge a financial payoff in context as that percent shouts at us,” he explained. “Others can correct me if I’m wrong, but Steam reviews usually hover around roughly 2% to 5% of copies sold, so if we go off of 5% and it has 10 reviews, that’s around 200 copies sold. If a 400% increase occurred, then they’ve now sold close to 1,000 copies. That’s really awesome for an indie dev; a few thousand bucks is nothing to shy away from and can get them going on their next project. I do believe it gave them a boost, but this is very much a PR headline rather than an exponential overnight success.”

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• dpkonofa@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  That’s not true. I am one of these people. It did not help sales.

  source