Comment on Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"
dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 year agoThe end result is not the same. You can’t physically reproduce and share a book fast enough, for free to create the same dent that you can by digitally reproducing something ad infinitum. I didn’t miss the point. Again, you missed the point of the thread that you responded to. You didn’t respond to the main thread on this post, you responded to a comment that the authors of this content deserve the income and value of the media you’re ingesting.
You’re just a dishonest person. I don’t want you on my side. You don’t see the harm you’re causing and then attempt to justify it because you’re a bad person who doesn’t care if you’re hurting people and stealing their livelihood just so you can have something like an entitled child. On top of that, you keep pretending like I missed the point when you keep ignoring the point you responded to. Just go away.
schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why are you assuming it’s being done for profit? I already said it was to share with my friends. You can’t take money from an artist if they never had the intention of buying in the first place.
dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 year ago
schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 year ago
dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No. My argument centers on people being paid for the work they create. It has nothing to do with profit. If anything, it has to do with revenue. Please keep up. If you don’t know what’s being discussed, stop interjecting yourself.