He can pay for it, but would you dump money into a burning pit over and over and over again, after you already dropped around 1/8th of your total worth into a failure? Especially when you only bought it because you were forced to by law? Musk has been directly asked if he would subsidize it more with his personal fortune recently, and in response he whined about who would be at blame for it going bankrupt. I dont think hes going to put anymore of his money into it.
Even in Twitter’s fully profitable years where it made 1.5bil lre buyout, that still would barely service its new yearly debt. That was before he lost 30% of the userbase and 50% of the total advertising, including nearly all of the large advertisers.
His current replacement for losing all those advertisers and 100s of million of dollars? Paid twotter blue, which apprently is about 300k out of 400mil users, or less than 0.1% of total users. As you can imagine, their 3mil/yr is no even relevant to the 100s of millions/yr shortfall his behavior has caused.
His “lets be wechat” idea is also ludicrous. He has said that he thinks X can take over 50% of all banking in the world, which by the numbers is all of US, Europe and China combined. This means taking over an area that already has native apps that are entrenched and making billions, but also convince all Europeans and Americans to abandon banks and put their money into an technically unstable platform run by a loud and proud antisemite. This ignores that Americans and Europeans already have “use an app for banking” like google pay and apple pay, but apprently vastly prefer using cc/debit by a ratio of 90%. The apps are already on all our phones, and most no one uses them.
So yeah, his “hail mary” is to eliminate huge, state supported rivals in China, and to change all of the 100 billion dollar banking landscape in the US/Europe where no one wants an app to do this.
hypnotoad__@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Just wait everyone, Elon is actually being smart this whole time” I just don’t buy it.