Nah, they’re just gonna say you can use AI or something. They’re a troll; they’re not going to budge.
Comment on Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police
rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 months agoThis is the explanation that CosmicCleric needs in order to understand binary search.
Because as it is, (s)he’s failing abysmally at demonstrating any understanding whatsoever of that subject.
null@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I’m not trolling, and I stand by what I said.
null@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
And to recap, what you said is:
If an event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue, you will see that event happen using a binary search.
Which is, of course, false.
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 months ago
And to recap, what you said is:
If an event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue, you will see that event happen using a binary search.
Which is, of course, false.
It’s not false if the event changes the environment around it, which was my point.
You incorrectly assuming a completely clean and static event that does not affect anything around it afterwards, and in the real world that’s just not usually the case.
And for the record, I never said it works 100% of the time.
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I’ve written binary searches before.