Comment on Detroit's newest road can charge electric cars as they drive on it

• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That ain’t everywhere.

  Certainly more than the US though.

  source

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That is everywhere that Chinese people live in that country. They consolidated their flyover zones to the left side of the country.

    source

    • frezik@midwest.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Most of that region is mountains, tundra, and desert. Nobody lives there for a reason.

      source

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Exactly

        source
• SCB@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  everywhere

  Don’t look at the left side of the map tho

  source

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    More than 96 percent of the Chinese population lives in the eastern half of that country.

    The trains go to the population centers of the 3 and 1/2% on the west side.

    Trains service everyone everywhere in that country.

    source

    • SCB@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There is no concentration of US citizens like this. There is no way to service the number of scattered towns we have with one tail line without a truly massive expenditure of resources and I just do not see the point in locking resources into that instead of maintaining current infrastructure for far less.

      source

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        When you talk about maintaining the current infrastructure, you’re talking about completely replacing it anyway at a higher cost since it’s falling apart must be meticulously replaced with crappier materials. Why replace the same slow, century old infrastructure when you can replace it with high speed trains and rail that costs far less?

        There are so many obvious reasons to catch up with the rest of the world in terms of transportation.

        Because the current infrastructure doesn’t connect the country.

        Because that inadequate infrastructure is literally falling apart.

        Because poor Americans can’t easily move to places with better opportunity.

        Because rail can be enacted extremely quickly and positively impact the lives of 300 plus million people.

        Also, you’re completely wrong about the concentration of US population, which is very much concentrated on the east and west coasts.

        Affordable transportation benefits a country nationally and individuals immeasurably at a very low cost.

        Every country with trains has proven that, even the ones as large as the US.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • frezik@midwest.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No, that’s completely wrong. The US concentrates a lot of population on the eastern seaboard, still has a lot of people as you move towards the Mississippi, but then quickly falls off to nothing as you hit the plains and Rocky Mountains. Picks up again right along the western seaboard.

        Yes, we do have a concentration of population a lot like this. Or more accurately, two separate concentration regions with mountains in between.

        source