Thanks for the clarification. Title is word salad.
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s section 702 folks.
trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You got it. Really dislike titles like that as well.
MataVatnik@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ah yes, I heard multiple podcasts on it in the defense sector defending it. There is a lot of lobbying I’m favor of it being renewed. Allegedly it only targets foreign agents, essentially terrorist operating abroad but using our internet infrastructure, so we intercept their messages. FBI can make requests for this information if they have a credible threat, in the past the threshold for request was low so agents were using it for cases that shouldn’t have been used for. The dragnet of data collection is indiscriminate, so your data as a citicen is still being collected anyways. There is also some mental gymnastics on why the FBI doesn’t need a search warrant (because the data was already collected LOL) and apparently it already held up in court cases before.
For those interested here it is:
open.spotify.com/episode/5WVa0u04qWuqqtXBZHYUv0?s…
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fucking barf.
End to end open source encryption for all!