Comment on Will people respond better if you say you're teetotal, or straight edge?
SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world 1 year agoOh, absolutely. I have no problem with other people doing recreational drugs. I see it as entirely their choice as it only really affects them personally. I don’t think it’s immoral or “sinful” (whatever that really means) or whatever.
And I think most people do respect that. I do appreciate these responses that make it clear that we should respect if someone either does or doesn’t want to consume recreational drugs.
But I really was just looking for a term to explain abstinence of recreational drugs to people who I know won’t judge or care, but without the baggage or misunderstandings that may come with saying “sober” (possible assumption: former/recovering alcoholic/addict), “teetotal” (possible misunderstanding: doesn’t use alcohol, might still be fine with other recreational drugs), or “straight edge” (possible misunderstanding: not only doesn’t consume drugs, but also is into the punk music scene).
After gathering data, the best term I could come up with is quite a simple one: “drug-free”. To be clear, we could say “recreational drug-free”, though that’s rather wordy and the meaning of “recreational drugs” is often understood by just saying “drugs” anyway.
I know you didn’t ask but I just thought I’d say this anyway lol.
havokdj@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I agree with most of what you said. I think the only time drug use can become immoral is if your usage brings legitimate suffering upon others.
SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Right, like smoking in front of a baby (and exposing them to second-hand smoke). I guess that’s a good example.