Is the better way is a runtime performance hit. Does the compiler optimize this?
Comment on Bill is a pro grammer
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 year agoI’ve seen code that look like this:
int delay = 15 * 60; // 10 minutes
Even if the comment was on the same line someone forgot to update it.
Better solution is to write (in C#):
TimeSpan delay = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(15)
Much more obvious what the code actually means.
CCatMan@lemmy.one 1 year ago
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 year ago
It’s probably a little bit slower, but there are other things more worth to optimize than to shave off a few microseconds from a 15 minute delay.
CCatMan@lemmy.one 1 year ago
Yeah, it adds up eventually when working with embedded platforms, but for PC stuff I agree.
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 year ago
If you’re working in embedded I guess you can probably make an inline function or a macro so it’s taken care of at compile time.
18107@aussie.zone 1 year ago
A better comment would be
delay in seconds
as that is the one thing not obvious from glancing at the code.magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 year ago
Or just name the variable
delaySeconds
if you really want to store it as an int. Bonus is that every use of the variable perfectly communicates what it is.