How does this work for international performers though?
Comment on Spotify will end service in Uruguay due to bill requiring fair pay for artists
Mahlzeit@feddit.de 7 months agoThanks.
Putting the El Observador article through translate
When a song in Uruguay is played on radio, television or at a party, the rights are collected by the General Association of Authors of Uruguay (Agadu) which retains the 60% of what is paid. The remaining 40% is divided equally between performers and record labels.
Spotify says that it already pays for the rights. This understanding would mean that the players in Uruguay should work out how that is to be split.
Spotify fears that the new law turns what they pay currently, simply into one share of the total, implying an extreme increase of the cost.
vin@lemmynsfw.com 7 months ago
Magrath@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
What is Agadu? Seems like a pretty high tax considering the remaining 40% go to those who made the music .
brunox@feddit.cl 7 months ago
AGADU is the society of authors. Kind of an union (it’s not an union but sort of). It’s suppossed role is defending the rights of authors
Mahlzeit@feddit.de 7 months ago
It’s a copyright management firm. Some countries have government-sponsored monopolists for that. This looks like one of those.
The author of a song and the performers may not be the same (most obvious with covers). Most of the money collected by Agadu is presumably paid out to the authors/songwriters (or whoever they sold the rights to?), minus management fees. Whether the pay-out scheme is fair, may be another point of contention. Think about a live band playing covers by various authors in some bar: How is it tracked what they play, and how much should be given to each of the many different authors? I don’t know how that works in Uruguay, but my country has a system of that sort.