Comment on BBC: The woman who successfully sued the website that matched her with a paedophile explains how she forced the site to close down. 'Alice', or A.M. as she was known in court says she feels "vindic...

• LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • FishFace@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    How does that contradict what I said, or else what point are you trying to make?

    Even though you’re quite sure the site owner needed to do more to stop paedophiles, you haven’t said what. Is what you think he should have done to have sacrificed anonymity?

    source

    • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      [deleted]

      source

      • FishFace@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Statement by Leif K-Brooks:

        Omegle’s moderation even had a positive impact beyond the site. Omegle worked with law enforcement agencies, and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, to help put evildoers in prison where they belong. There are “people” rotting behind bars right now thanks in part to evidence that Omegle proactively collected against them, and tipped the authorities off to.

        Example article: guelphmercury.com/…/article_7b1fca76-cef1-56e5-a9…

        The NCMEC received information from Omegle about the activities of a paedophile and it led to their conviction.

        But your quote is not the opposite of my claim. It says that “the site has been mentioned in more than 50 cases against paedophiles.” How many of those cases included evidence collected and submitted by Omegle?

        Do please answer my question:

        Even though you’re quite sure the site owner needed to do more to stop paedophiles, you haven’t said what. Is what you think he should have done to have sacrificed anonymity?

        source

        • -> View More Comments