Comment on YouTube warns it might make your viewing experience worse if you don't turn off your ad-blocker

• Bulletdust@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I do pay. They use my private browsing data for free, in return I watch YouTube with no ads because I use an adblocker. I have nothing in place preventing Google from tracking my internet usage, so they’re free to use my data while I can watch YouTube for free without four ads in a 15 minute video.

  As stated, I am not some commodity that exists solely as a means for large publically traded corporations bigger than most Governments to make a killing in relation to profits because of the modern mindset that growth must be sustained quarter over quarter in order to appease shareholders.

  source

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What are you rambling about? If you pay, they don’t push ads.

    source

    • Bulletdust@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If I use an adblocker under FF they don’t push ads either, while Google still make record profits quarter over quarter using my personal data.

      If we use Spotify as an example of modern corporate culture, it’s deemed acceptable that they effectively rob artists if rightful income using a pricing structure that equates to a couple of cents in the dollar for the artist - While Spotify themselves pocket a vast proportion of profits. But if I use an adblocker on the free version of Spotify, I’m going against their terms and conditions and robbing Spotify of ‘rightful income’.

      In certain countries, Spotify have actually pulled their service as a result of being told they have to overhaul their pricing structure to renumerate artists fairly if they want to provide their service in the country in question.

      The hipocracy regarding modern corporate culture and service pricing is extreme. If such a perspective is good enough for the service provider, it’s good enough for me.

      source

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        👌

        source