Comment on 95% of OpenAI employees have threatened to quit in standoff with board

• deweydecibel@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Of course it is, that was always the case. Anyone that genuinely believed there was any non-profit, humanitarian, risk-averse future for this technology was drinking copious amounts of Kool aid.

  These things have been designed, from day 1, with the explicit purpose of killing labor and making a lot of people richer. This was never, ever, a tool for the common man.

  source
• Marrenia@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  So? No matter who owns it it’s still a massive invasion of privacy at the minimum - at least look on it as the shit show it is

  source

  • Phlogiston@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t see the existence or use of GPT to be a “massive invasion of privacy” — although I agree that the chat logs can be very personal.

    What aspects are you concerned about?

    source

    • Marrenia@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Microsoft and Google literally take any personal files you have stored on one drive or Google drive and use it to train their models - I’d say that’s a massive invasion of privacy

      source

      • Phlogiston@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Google’s privacy policy states this is only true for public documents: “use publicly available information to help train Google’s AI models and build products and features like Google Translate, Bard, and Cloud AI capabilities”.

        That seems different from your claim.

        source