Comment on GM’s big bet on driverless cars turns sour
vmaziman@lemm.ee 8 months ago
While self driving cars seem like a good way for enterprise to bypass the cost of paying a driver, the driver other function isn’t to drive the car, but to be liable for its operation.
I wonder if it’s gonna take an insurance company to push for this on pure observed case rates before we see any driverless cars. And if insurance companies don’t want to be liable then we may never see them.
Delta_V@midwest.social 8 months ago
The insurance companies will go for it if the data shows driverless cars cause fewer accidents and lower claims versus human drivers, but it seems like that data will be a long time coming because right now the court of public opinion goes nuts when a driverless car hits someone while ignoring all the times that a human does the same. It makes no sense, and I hope the insurance companies can make it make sense soon.
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 months ago
They can always put some money to back it up, if the statistics really tell them so. I guess we’ll see it when it happens.