Comment on Disability pensioner charged $6,760 for renting a phone that retails for around $1,800
Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 year agoAnd you know that no information was deliberately obfuscated or hidden by the vendor? The vendor currently being sued by regulators for operating a business model “designed to avoid consumer protections for financially vulnerable consumers.”?
Curious as to how you know this information. Do you have a copy of the court filings? Please feel free to share if you do.
wahming@monyet.cc 1 year ago
You keep putting words in my mouth. Please share where I said anything like that.
Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 year ago
Actually I’ll do one better. While you were deflecting, I found the court filings.
Not shockingly, one of the main causes of action against the defendant is that they are dressing up a credit contract as a lease agreement to avoid interest rate caps (Section 3.2) and disclosure requirements (Section 3.3).
Damingly: Image
Let’s see you use that calculator in your pocket to determine if you’re getting a reasonable deal without being told the original price of the goods, the interest rate, and how the interest was calculated.
egg1918@hexbear.net 1 year ago
Damn sure is strange they stopped responding after this comment thonk
Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 1 year ago
(They got banned)