The trick is to make it so their product isn't reliable enough to use. Then they care.
Comment on Google sues people who “weaponized” DMCA to remove rivals’ search results
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Wait, Google cares about DMCA abuse!? Someone tell them about YouTube.
AnonTwo@kbin.social 10 months ago
ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Unless it’s themselves making it less reliable to push more ads.
blackbrook@mander.xyz 10 months ago
But they are doing that themselves already. I think they care because handling takedowns creates work for them and because they may be taking down search results that generate them ad revenue.
CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It started to affect someone’s bottom line.
Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Most of the YouTube issues aren’t DMCA claims but their own Content ID horseshit where there’s automated matching, zero policing of catalogs and associated rights, and seemingly zero recourse for misrepresentations.
I’m friends with a YouTuber (with just under 1M subs) who has licensed music for his intro/outro. Other people have taken that music and created remixes, then uploaded those remixes to rights management companies with access to the Content ID system. They then flag the original work automatically, which allows them to divert monetization from the YouTuber. It doesn’t go into escrow pending dispute resolution. The claiming company just gets to steal the money and keep it no matter what the ultimate result is. On top of that the initial appeal/dispute process is decided by the claiming party instead of someone neutral like YouTube themselves. It’s usually a huge hassle to resolve. My friend has lost thousands of dollars through this.
Makeitstop@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The automatic diverting of money to the copyright troll is the part that gets me. That really ought to open YouTube up for liability just as much if not more so than hosting copyright violating material. Copyright trolls should be facing fraud charges and systems that reward them should be under intense legal scrutiny.
Sadly, that’s not how it works and even if there was enough interest to organize and lobby for a positive change, there’d still be zero chance of congress anything useful in the foreseeable future.