Comment on Toyota trials hydrogen-powered vehicle on public roads in Australia

rolling_resistance@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• mihies@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wat? You sure understand what hydrogen is?

  source

  • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The fuckcars community has their nose so far up their ass, they think any kind of personal transportation is the devils spawn and no amount of improvents will fix that. In their eyes, everyone should be forced to live in dense urban environments and ride some kind of shared public transportation everywhere.

    There are good talking points in their propaganda, for sure, but just like everything today, the echo chamber is so strong, they are now extremists on the matter.

    source

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      yeah even as someone that really likes PT I think the fuckcars community is a pretty bad community that just simps for the new shiny thing rather than talking about things that actually improves PT.

      Still, suburbia should stop being subsidised and more transit oriented systems should be built.

      source
    • Phlogiston@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The extremes always look silly. Take for example the little dick energy of a big lifted pickup with tiny wheels blowing coal.

      Where the fuckcars folks are correct is that many many car drivers claim they NEED some monstrously fast, big, powerful, etc vehicle and to drive too fast, take up lots of room, crush people, look “cool” etc to go a few miles to buy some milk.

      Any rural town with a speed limit near a school knows that when people get into their cars a lot of excuses for why they need a car become armor for why they need to be allowed to drive like dicks.

      I don’t think we’d see fuckcars have nearly the staying power if those people were driving sensible vehicles at sensible speeds and didn’t claim priority over every piece of road.

      source

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Totally agree with this although it’s a uniquely an american problem. In my neck of the woods, cars are more sensible and I would still say there’s a lot more room for improvement, both in what people are alowed to take on the roads and public transportation options.

        But the circlejerk that is fuckcars makes even the people driving the Renault Twizy seem like monsters.

        source
    • sugartits@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You’ve basically just summed up Lemmy.

      source
  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    A fuel that is notoriously hard to contain and usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity.

    Anyway, the commenter you’re replying to is more referring to the pollution from tires and the noise.

    source

    • DScratch@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      And the death. Don’t forget the animal and human cost of everyone having a car.

      source

      • mihies@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        What costs do you mean?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • mihies@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity

      Well, it's either one or the another. While the energy loss is relatively high when using electricity, it's not a problem when you have an oversupply of renewable energy, actually it's even beneficial as it provides a storage for otherwise lost energy.
      But regardless of the production, it generates no pollution when consumed by a vehicle. You know, like clean air in cities.

      And of course, hydrogen won't solve tire pollution nor associated noise (albeit I guess it should be more silent that fossil fuel one) but it's still environmental friendly compared to what we have now.

      source
    • Pipoca@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Sprawl itself is also pretty terrible for the environment

      source