Comment on EU Article 45 requires that browsers trust certificate authorities appointed by governments
ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 year agoYeah that argument holds zero water. Forcing browsers to trust these roots means not only pre-trusting them, but disallowing removal of trust. This is completely intended for surveillance purposes.
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Removal of trust happened many times in the past. And like I said, it’s not changing anything other than making things easier. You can still add certificates to the browser trusted list if you have access to the person’s computer, which when you install any software you do. Perhaps the best middle ground would be to add certificates but make them conditional that is to say ask the user what they want to do and offer multiple options. Trust for this domain only, trust always, just this time, don’t trust.
ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article. You can keep shilling for government surveillance if you want.
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Am not shilling, am merely pointing out there are easier ways to spy on people without putting it through legal channels.
ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And another pointless argument. “They could spy on you easier means they’re not.”
I know I said I was done, but good lord. I can’t tell if you are trying to troll or you’re completely devoid of logic or reason.