I’d argue that in those cases the product is straight-up defective. I mean it was falsely advertised. Expecting me to pay returns in that case is absurd.
marshadow@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So companies will stop lying in the sizing charts, right? Right?
If the sizing chart says size M fits a 28” waist and the size M is actually 32” in the waist, their lying ass should pay the return shipping.
Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
nutsack@lemmy.world 1 year ago
if it’s a cheap brand it’s possible that their supplier made them incorrectly and they don’t even know about it or they don’t care enough to throw the product away
kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
or they don’t care
It’s usually that.
Plague_Doctor@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Design ease and wearing ease are necessary for garments. That said, at least 1-1.5 " in the waistband is the average for wearing ease. Also that depends on where the waistband is designed to sit on the body. Low rise jeans have a larger waistband than high rise jeans just by nature of where the band sits. This has a lot to do with the fact ready-to-wear clothing sucks at fitting the diverse range of bodies out there.
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Mankind will die out before vanity sizes do.