Comment on Many physicists assume we must live in a multiverse – but their basic maths may be wrong
FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 year agowhy put so goddamn much of it out of reach
You’re assuming that it was only tuned for human life and/or that life is meant to leave its home planet.
A gardener designs a garden so that each plant has a place and doesn’t let any plant take over the whole garden. If “someone” designed this place, it is entirely possible that we are stuck in a corner for a reason.
Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 year ago
It's not just our home planet. Because the universe is expanding we won't ever get further than our local group before it's receding faster than the speed of light. Almost all of the universe will never be
If I thought the universe was made "for" anything it would probably be black holes.
FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The point is that you are assuming “inaccessibility” is incompatible with a universe “made for life”. But it’s entirely possible that inaccessibility is a feature, not a bug.
At the risk of anthopomorphizing, every nonhuman life I’m responsible for is given very little access to move elsewhere.
Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 year ago
Then why make so much space if it's just going to sit there empty? Seems like quite a waste of effort
FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Who says the universe is empty? It’s mostly inaccessible by humans, but it might be teeming with life. Though not necessarily intelligent life.