Comment on Wikipedia Admin Unmasks As Alt Account Of Admin Who Was Extremely Banned In 2015 To The Great Bewilderment Of Everyone

• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  But why? “Extremely banned”, what the fuck?

  source

  • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Extreme baby! sounds of explosions and massive fireballs

    The guy was not just ‘perma banned’, they rolled out the fucking carpet for him while there was heavy metal playing in the background.

    ‘Extremely banned™’ was the closest way to even begin describing how utterly hard the guy was banned.

    source

    • 1847953620@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Bannedly Broken

      source
  • Gargantu8@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Threw me off so hard!

    source
  • Aatube@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Also,

    Search engine optimisation (finding of fact)

    3. Wifione has edited Wikipedia to the advantage of the IIPM and to the detriment of its competitors, in a manner consistent with attempts to optimise search engine results. (See Jehochman's evidence and Harry Mitchell's analysis.)

       Passed 12 to 0 at 12:11, 2015-02-13 (8 years, 8 months, 25 days ago) (UTC−5)

    Sock puppetry

    4. Following a review of Jayen466's evidence and a historic CheckUser result, the Committee considers it likely that User:Wifione is a sockpuppet of User:Empengent, formerly Mrinal Pandey. The User:Wifione account was created and operated while Empengent (talk · contribs) was blocked.

       Passed 10 to 2 at 12:11, 2015-02-13 (8 years, 8 months, 25 days ago) (UTC−5)

    Endless disputes

    5. Commentary – varying from constructive criticism to ad hominem remarks – about Wifione has been posted in many forums on many occasions over five years without resolution. Forums include: Wikiquette assistance ([11], [12], [13]); the Administrators' noticeboard, ([14]); the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ([15], [16]); Jimmy Wales' talk page ([17], [18], [19], [20]) and Editor review/Wifione [21]).

    Basically notorious.

    source
  • Aatube@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    In addition, extensive evidence was presented during the case, backed up by analysis from Jayen466 in the workshop, that Wifione was likely a reincarnation of an editor who was blocked for extensive sock-puppetry in 2008, after abusing dozens of accounts to conduct a similar campaign over a period of several years which included threatening editors who persistently challenged the abuse. Arbitrators were sufficiently satisfied by the evidence of sock-puppetry that they passed (by a majority of ten to two) a finding of fact stating that Wifione was likely a sock-puppet, and thus that the account was created in violation of a block.

    source

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      No, I mean those two words don’t fit next to each other, your title is just shit!

      source

      • Aatube@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That part isn't my title and your wording is shine. Rise, boy, adverbs can describe gerunds.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • 1847953620@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    as opposed to gently banned a little bit

    source
  • mojo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It means banned but like giga banned

    source

    • 1847953620@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Image

      source
• raptir@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I love that you take ownership of your mistakes. I’ll be putting this in your annual review.

  source