Comment on Rule 3 - Updated
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Can vibe-coded apps be flagged as low effort, they steal code from other developers and claim it to be their own.
Comment on Rule 3 - Updated
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Can vibe-coded apps be flagged as low effort, they steal code from other developers and claim it to be their own.
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 month ago
I think an AI tag (honestly i think there are a few different ones that could/should be used) would be appropriate, but I’m not going to outright remove as “low effort”, no.
There are a few reasons for that. The first is thats a community decision, not a decision for me to make for the community.
I personally don’t agree either. Its just a tool, and like any tool can be used well or used poorly, which can usually be seen quite easily in code. For example, LLM’s are excellent for finding security issues, being pretty good at explaining code blocks or APIs being connected to, or resolving issues with errors that may be more esoteric.
What they aren’t great at, IMO, is creating the entire thing whole hog, thats typically where you’ll find issues (though it can happen in small sections of code, so a person should review that as well).
Beyond the tool and thinking of it in terms of copyright and complaints about data centers and the like, I would still disagree as the root of the problem has nothing to do with the tool and everything to do with capitalism. A local model needs drastically less power than something coming out of anthropic or Microsoft, which has more to do with them abusing your data than the actual operations themselves.
But considering its use and application, including the Linux kernel BTW, expecting everything to be llm-free is pretty much a non-starter, fwiw.
That said, I’ll be making a post about it along with some other items that should probably get tagged such as commercial applications, freemium models, etc, so the community can come to a consensus.