Comment on [deleted]

• DmMacniel@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  , and it’s easier to care about humans as a whole once you care about non-humans b.t.w.).

  citation needed

  source

  • soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What i meant in my previous comment didn’t took into account the propaganda about other humans being evil, the logic was that once you refuse to kill a non-human it’s easier to refuse killing a human, and once you have non-humans it’s easier to accept the thought of having human slaves.
    But we may indeed still hate other humans because they’re evil and we’re liberating their population, or ourselves, yet every conflict could have been avoided if both sides agreed to unite in diversity, i don’t see an exception to this rule. And we’re still nowadays attributing the roles of good//evil instead of seeking solutions to please both sides(, usually because the strongest side, very often the west, refuses to change or make concessions).

    source

    • DmMacniel@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s not that world peace is difficult,

      It absolutely is. The Human factor is too insurmountable.

      source

      • soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That’s a topic i love and i don’t often have the possibility to see someone not thinking it is possible(, i’ve never met someone arguing that it is not desirable).
        If you pointed at our arrogant/selfish desire to be “on top” of the other, then my answer would be to explain why everyone would gain and be more powerful if we’re united, and it must be lonely at the top, with only one culture, if we have friendly countries who are really different in many domain then it’s better to be friends with equals, we have to think of infallible measures against treason but that’s not impossible.

        source

        • -> View More Comments