Fwiw I disagreed with you but upvoted for making a reasoned argument. We do need to drop that reddit mentality of downvote what you disagree with. IMHO you should downvote things that are either demonstrably false, or low-effort.
That said, I think both voice/image impersonation would fit the bill for “intent to deceive”. I’d be surprised if it didn’t already have a lot of legal precedent in the realm of advertising.
casetext.com/case/waits-v-frito-lay-inc
The tom watts case is the only one I’m aware of off the top of my head, but the TL/Dr is they tried to license a song of his to use, he refused, so they just hired an impersonator to sing in his style instead. He sued Frito lay and won.
SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The ad itself makes it clear it’s impersonating her.
ayaya@lemdro.id 8 months ago
SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I do not and good luck finding it. Searches are nothing but articles or video news broadcasts about the ad but I haven’t been able to find the actually ad.
ayaya@lemdro.id 8 months ago