Comment on thisIsGoingToBeASeriousDebate
30p87@feddit.de 1 year ago
Personally,
echo Hello World!
use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh") .arg("-c") .arg("echo Hello World!") .spawn() .unwrap(); }
Like this?
No, more like
use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh").arg("-c").arg("echo Hello World!").spawn().unwrap(); }
. Just a little bit shorter, as it seems /s
I just fucking threw up
I did too. Multiple times in fact, I had to look at the other Rust code!
Isn’t echo a shell builtin?
Yes and no. While coreutils does provide an echo binary, shells also have a built-in for optimisation purposes.
echo
At first I had the code calling the binary directly, but then changed it to spawning a shell (and so using the builtin). It’s very cursed either way.
pranaless@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Like this?
30p87@feddit.de 1 year ago
No, more like
use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh").arg("-c").arg("echo Hello World!").spawn().unwrap(); }
.
Just a little bit shorter, as it seems /s
funkajunk@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I just fucking threw up
30p87@feddit.de 1 year ago
I did too. Multiple times in fact, I had to look at the other Rust code!
TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev 1 year ago
Isn’t echo a shell builtin?
pranaless@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Yes and no. While coreutils does provide an
echo
binary, shells also have a built-in for optimisation purposes.At first I had the code calling the binary directly, but then changed it to spawning a shell (and so using the builtin). It’s very cursed either way.