Comment on AI doomsday warnings a distraction from the danger it already poses, warns expert

• mosiacmango@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No ethics based lapses.

  source

  • p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Then the only recourse is to create ethical constraints. Challenging, but possible, even with current LLM technology.

    source
• bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No coffee breaks

  source
• grue@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Folks expect humans to be unethical, and [at least try to] put in checks and balances for it. When it’s an AI, on the other hand, lots of folks are too computer-illiterate to treat it as anything but infallible magic.

  source
• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Upvote for a good, thought provoking question.

  source
• jacksilver@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s the fact that ethical people can easily create unethical AI. The core problem is reinforcing biases/stereotypes in the data without realizing. Obviously there are other concerns about purposefully doing unethical stuff, but the real issue is that AI/ML just learns from what it’s given.

  Examples range from cameras that think most people from Asia have their eyes closed digitaltrends.com/…/facial-recognition-software-p… to things like Amazon reinforcing gender hiring biases reuters.com/…/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insig…

  Ultimately even when built “correctly” AI can be extremely dangerous.

  source
• uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Allegedly you can bring a bad human actor to justice, though we typically do not.

  source
• yuun@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  speed

  source