Of course, as soon as two people take this advice and then attempt to communicate, we have reached the standoff, where One of the two people must swear off their data sovereignty.
What is your idea to solve this?
With centralized messaging services, both of them must swear off their data sovereignty.
While with true peer to peer systems none of them must do that, that model is not really compatible with mobile devices as both the sender and the receiver has to be online at the same time for the message to go through, and generally any device that is not online 24/7, which mostly includes all desktop PCs.
For this reason, I think that for the average user (who does not have a 24/7 online server-role machine, or maybe even a desktop computer) the best solution is to choose a server operator who they trust with their data. Or, they may try to run a lightweight homeserver on their mobile device (laptop or even smartphone), and live with it’s shortcomings. Not like it’s not possible, and this way everyone can register where they want, including their own part-time server if they are more comfortable that way.
However I think I did not totally understand what is your exact concern.
Do you think it to be a problem that even if you run your own server, messages you sent to your friend on another one will be stored on that homeserver too?
If so, I don’t think it’s possible to solve that problem. They (your friend) have chosen to take a compromise between security and ease of use by trusting someone else with storage. You can’t tell them - only suggest - where should they store their data, otherwise they would lose their sovereignty over it.
Fortunately confidentiality can be kept with encryption, and if you are concerned with the other server having access to metadata, you could patch your server to try to generalize the message metadata to some extent, like with delaying sending messages to they 10th minute and such measures.
service has all the downsides of a centralized service
No it doesn’t? A single party cannot block you from participating in the network, as you can just find a different provider, and you can have control over what servers may store your data, both as a server operator and as a room admin.
ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 months ago
What is your idea to solve this?
With centralized messaging services, both of them must swear off their data sovereignty.
While with true peer to peer systems none of them must do that, that model is not really compatible with mobile devices as both the sender and the receiver has to be online at the same time for the message to go through, and generally any device that is not online 24/7, which mostly includes all desktop PCs.
For this reason, I think that for the average user (who does not have a 24/7 online server-role machine, or maybe even a desktop computer) the best solution is to choose a server operator who they trust with their data. Or, they may try to run a lightweight homeserver on their mobile device (laptop or even smartphone), and live with it’s shortcomings. Not like it’s not possible, and this way everyone can register where they want, including their own part-time server if they are more comfortable that way.
However I think I did not totally understand what is your exact concern.
Do you think it to be a problem that even if you run your own server, messages you sent to your friend on another one will be stored on that homeserver too?
If so, I don’t think it’s possible to solve that problem. They (your friend) have chosen to take a compromise between security and ease of use by trusting someone else with storage. You can’t tell them - only suggest - where should they store their data, otherwise they would lose their sovereignty over it.
Fortunately confidentiality can be kept with encryption, and if you are concerned with the other server having access to metadata, you could patch your server to try to generalize the message metadata to some extent, like with delaying sending messages to they 10th minute and such measures.
whale@lemm.ee 11 months ago
ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 months ago
No it doesn’t? A single party cannot block you from participating in the network, as you can just find a different provider, and you can have control over what servers may store your data, both as a server operator and as a room admin.