Comment on Spotify Removes Offensive Imagery But Keeps Transphobic Song Despite Outcry

• raptir@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s a tough distinction to make though. I would say let’s label it as objectionable content, maybe even ban it from being “promoted” (which honestly I hate that bands can pay to be forced on my home screen anyway) and call it a day.

  source

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Nah man, let’s hash it out: if your song is about attacking something other people don’t really have a choice in, say skin color, orientation, or health conditions, I’d say it falls under speech that should be shamed.

    People just want to live without really having to fight to exist, and I support that idea.

    source

    • Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The strongest argument I can come up with for why this should go is that it violates Spotify’s explicit policy on hate speech, inciting hatred against trans people. They remove other stuff that violates, and they were aware this did, as they removed them album artwork, so them deliberately not removing the song isn’t a lack of action, but an action of discrimination in and of itself

      If others want to argue that shouldn’t be Spotify’s policy, we can have that discussion, but if we only have that discussion when trans people are brought up then the discussion was never about free speech and thus arguing platforms, censorship, and tolerance paradoxes is moot. It’s just tone policing

      source