Comment

The general argument legally is that the AI has no exact memory of the copyrighted material.

But if that's the case, then these pixels shouldn't need be patched. Because it wouldn't remember the material that spawned them.

Is just the argument I assume would be used.

Sort:hotnew top

Maven@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
It’s like training an artist who’s never seen a banana or a fire hydrant, by passing them pictures of fire hydrants labelled “this is a banana”. When you ask for a banana, you’ll get a fire hydrant. Correcting that mistake doesn’t mean “undoing pixels”, it means teaching the AI what bananas and fire hydrants are.

source
FaceDeer@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Well, I guess we'll see how that argument plays in court. I don't see how it follows, myself.

source
KeenFlame@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
What is “patching pixels” and who would do it?

source
- AnonTwo@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Is that not answered in the original article?
  
  source