Comment on Youtube's Anti-adblock is illegal in the EU
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 11 months agoHow is it offputting to say “listen to me because I’m an expert, here’s my credentials”? Everybody’s so fast to claim “fake news” nowadays that demonstrating your credibility has become a requirement.
BaldProphet@kbin.social 11 months ago
The person he was responding to was asking for some specific clarification. Instead of offering it, he appealed to his own authority, essentially listing his credentials in a pompous way and then saying "You don't need to understand. I'm the expert, I'll understand it for you."
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 11 months ago
He’s answering to a person saying “IANAL” asking whether this really is illegal with “I am an expert on this particular law, helped to write its replacement and already had confirmation from DG Just (EU Commission) that the law applies in the way I have stated”. Seems perfectly apropos to me.
If you go to your lawyer and ask if you have a case and they say yes, do you ask them to walk you through evey single piece of applicable law or will you accept their service based on their credentials?
Not to mention that the guy has already made his argument earlier, they don’t need to repeat it over and over.
krellor@kbin.social 11 months ago
But he didn't cite policy, law, or legal analysis. I work as a technology policy writer/interpreter in the US so I can't address the EU issues. But I've never responded to someone who asked for the basis of my conclusion by listing my credentials. When I publish a policy position paper, I cite chapter and verse all relevant laws, policies, statutes, and explanation for interpretation. I've written entire pages offering justification for the interpretation of a single sentence a particular way. He didn't do that. He might be right, but he didn't justify it in any meaningful way.
HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 11 months ago
Yikes that reply was way out of proportion to the question, holy moly.