Doesn’t have to he illegal at all… I refuse to give up having control because of stupid backwards laws.
well yeah, if you pretend the laws don’t exist then nothing has to be illegal.
Comment on Spotify re-invented the radio
westyvw@lemm.ee 1 year agoDoesn’t have to he illegal at all. Plenty of freely shared music out there, and some with less restrictive licenses.
On the other hand it seems absurd I am not allowed to let other people browse my library and listen to songs. Not copy them, simply stream them.
What if we collectively bought the music and lent it out in library fashion? Only I user per stream. I refuse to give up having control because of stupid backwards laws.
notatoad@lemmy.world 1 year ago
westyvw@lemm.ee 1 year ago
More like get them changed of course, the rules make absolutely no sense. Of course that will be hard because the publishers and corporations have a nice racket going.
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
And this is enforced how? By having a whitelist of file hashes for songs that can be legally shared in this way? At that point just set up a server for streaming/downloading those files… except that already exists with their existing free distribution methods.
Licensing still applies, and technically you’re still providing a download by streaming with no drm.
I’d love for the money to materialize for that but it’s a pipe dream, and still likely has licensing concerns more complicated than you’re expecting. At that point you’re only a few steps from spotify again as well, as the costs of infrastructure for providing this service would not be anywhere close to as cheap as hosting for primarily text based servers. The money has to come from somewhere.
Beyond all that, federation doesn’t come into the concepts you’re suggesting yet at all. The only benefit to federation of this would be to spread the base files across more servers.
Additionally, you can totally share your music library with whoever you want already via a decent number of self-hostable media servers. Can even do the streaming only option that you seem to think would somehow make it legally more viable.
And there it is! Yo ho, yo ho…
For context, my home instance is the dbzero, the piracy instance. Yarr!
I guess I’m just trying to point out that if you don’t care about laws or being caught, you can already do exactly what you’re asking for fairly easily.
If you only care to share with specific trusted friends, those options work fine too as you won’t be caught.
If you simply don’t want to be caught, laws be damned, there’s options like soulseek, or maybe hosting a file or media server on Tor.
If you do care about laws and not having the music industry coming for your ass, then you should probably give up on this project as there’s too much money invested in the status quo to challenge it.
And ultimately, federation doesn’t solve any of the issues with music sharing or streaming expect maybe keeping the media available while just giving more targets for legal action.
Tl;dr- federation is a tool with uses and limitations like any other tool, not a magic “make the internet better” button
westyvw@lemm.ee 1 year ago
True about the enforcement, that would be difficult. If one of the federated nodes suddenly had copyright material, how would we know and deal with it? How does Funkwhale deal with it?
No, the whole point is distributed servers (and users), and there are not easy distribution using a single server method.
I can’t believe we cant get past this, it is ridiculous.