Comment

Comment on Spotify re-invented the radio

It’s still not a good justification for making the free version completely useless. Those limitations are just ridiculous; I miss the days where paying for a product only meant getting rid of ads and gaining some exclusive features. Maybe they should also reduce the label share instead of always making the customers pay more. I refuse to pay a subscription for non-trivial things like music; they can still make money off me with ads when I use the free version. They can increase their profits with other features like they are already doing by allowing people to buy merch from Spotify.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Those days were built on the backs of venture capital. They were never sustainable. Now you’re on the other end, and it’s either deal with more ads and more restrictions, or pay up and get rid of all of that.

source
- small44@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I pay for albums i can afford by buying them and pirate the rest
  
  source
BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I assure you, Spotify would love nothing more than to reduce the label share - it's not as if they love giving away almost all the money they make - but they also have next to no real leverage, since the labels have all the power here.

Again, Spotify loses money with every single free user. There may exist some balance point where they can actually reach financial stability by converting a large chunk of them into paying users, and I don't think can really blame them for doing what they can to achieve that.

That doesn't mean it doesn't suck to lose features you liked, but an individual not liking something doesn't make in immoral.

source
- small44@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I doubt major labels can live without Spotify as much as Spotify need major labels. They can push users to pay for Spotify by adding more cool features for payed users instead of removing fundamental features of the free version. Forcing people to pay is never the right solution
  
  source
  - BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    The labels could murder Spotify in a day if they decided to simply stop offering them licenses and went exclusive with Apple, Amazon, Tidal, or anyone else.
    
    The labels of course do get quite a lot of money from Spotify so they don't have much of a reason to do that, but again, they really are the ones that hold the cards.
    
    This is business. The only right solution is the one that gets them closer to financial stability. They have been developing features for the paid tier and have been exploring other revenue streams (hence the deep dive into podcasts), but ultimately, they have absolutely zero obligation to give away content for free.
    
    source
    small44@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Ok, forget about reducing the labels share. I think the other points i made about finding new ways to generate more profits are still valid and better than making the free version almost useless. If spotify wasn’t profiting from free users too they would shut down the free version completely
    
    source
    -> View More Comments