Comment on [deleted]
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year agoYou do understand that as his legal representation, they are arguing for him, which makes their argument legally literally his argument?
Comment on [deleted]
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year agoYou do understand that as his legal representation, they are arguing for him, which makes their argument legally literally his argument?
random65837@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No actually, thats not how lawyers work, you tell them your part, and they say itn how it needs to be said to work for you, hence the part of hiring them, its almost never verbatim.
So again, his lawyers words, not his. Can you quote HIM saying it, yes or no?
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why are you complaining to me, while the Independent must have made the same mistake in your eyes?
random65837@lemmy.world 1 year ago
LOL! I’m not, unless by “complaining” you mean not misquoting the article. I’ll take you not answering a simple yes/no question as a no. So now on top of you misquoting the article, now you’ve doubled down and now saying the author is wrong as well…priceless!
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The article is titled: “Donald Trump tells court he had no duty to ‘support’ the US Constitution”. You are claiming that this is incorrect, since Trump didn’t tell the court this. Why are you not complaining to the Independent?