Comment on Goodbye Youtube and thanks for all the fish
piekay@feddit.de 1 year agoI totally agree. I am a Youtube Premium user for this exact reason. No ads means less financial incentive to track me (I remember a statistic where one user was worth 4cents per year, could be wrong about the exact number though). In a perfect world we would habe monetization networks instead of ad networks, on a pay per view or subscription model instead of ads. This would not only make the companies more money, but also reduce the incentive for them to track you (I would even claim that unnecessary tracking would hurt their business).
We can either have a free (as in no costs) or a free (as in liberty) internet, not both
stardust@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
They are still tracking you though. Probably more information since payment information is being provided. Removing ads is a reason to pay for YouTube premium, but it’s not to get less tracking. Less tracking I not the selling point or service offered by YouTube premium.
fugacity@kbin.social 1 year ago
They're definitely still tracking their premium users, I agree. But my counterpoint is, what business, online or not, doesn't track me? If I go out and buy something at a retail store I'm gonna bet my ass I'm being tracked. If I don't want to be tracked, then I should be making sure information I consider to be sensitive is not being exposed. If there is no reasonable expectation to privacy in the public, then I think it's fit that there's no reasonable expectation to privacy when I'm surfing the internet.
stardust@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
My point is it is pointless to bring up tracking into the discussion, since it’s not a benefit of the service. The YouTube premium feature can’t be used without an account so provides more tracking with account data and payment information being provided.
Read the comment I responded to. They said YouTube premium provides them with less incentive to track them. I’m informing them that is not the benefit of paying for YouTube premium.
fugacity@kbin.social 1 year ago
In a sense I agree with that piekay though. If they can't serve me targeted ads on YouTube they lose that money trying to develop technology to track me in that regard. How much money that is I guess is hard to say, since the tracking on YouTube certainly can carry over to other parts of Alphabet.
piekay@feddit.de 1 year ago
That’s because they still have a financial incentive to do so: Google doesn’t offer a fully paid version of their service