Maybe they figure they'll get more revenue per-view through their website, and by removing their videos from YouTube they'll drive enough new viewers there to make up for the loss.
Let's see how that works, I guess.
SuiXi3D@kbin.social 1 year ago
So, rather than having some revenue coming in from YouTube, they’d rather force everyone to use their own website? Do they not understand that not everyone watches YouTube on a computer? Some exclusively use the YouTube app on their phones, TVs, or game consoles.
I dunno. It’s not as if it costs them anything to host the videos on YouTube. Seems odd to completely cut off a revenue source like that.
Maybe they figure they'll get more revenue per-view through their website, and by removing their videos from YouTube they'll drive enough new viewers there to make up for the loss.
Let's see how that works, I guess.
Zorque@kbin.social 1 year ago
They have apps for phone, TV, and game consoles, though.
SuiXi3D@kbin.social 1 year ago
And, as far as I’ve always known, those apps are awful. I haven’t checked in awhile though.
Zorque@kbin.social 1 year ago
YouTube ain't much better, even if you pay for it.