Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists
Comment on emacs
Spider89@lemmy.world 1 year agoI use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
brodoshmodo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Comment on emacs
Spider89@lemmy.world 1 year agoI use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 year ago
4 letters < 2 letters.
Vi forever.
Spider89@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Simplicity > Complexity
Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 year ago
Not if you need any work done.
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
That’s when you switch to a IDE.
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Nano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.