Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists
Comment on emacs
Spider89@lemmy.world 8 months agoI use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
brodoshmodo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Comment on emacs
Spider89@lemmy.world 8 months agoI use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 8 months ago
4 letters < 2 letters.
Vi forever.
Spider89@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Simplicity > Complexity
Prunebutt@feddit.de 8 months ago
Not if you need any work done.
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
That’s when you switch to a IDE.
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Nano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.