Comment on Apple's carbon-neutral product claims called a 'climate-wash'
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 year agoYou don’t understand
Comment on Apple's carbon-neutral product claims called a 'climate-wash'
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 year agoYou don’t understand
Tibert@jlai.lu 1 year ago
Are you stupid? I’m talking of the first time they removed the charger.
IPhone 12 - 2020.
Here they are talking about devices having USB C for 2024.
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yes, the article is not about that…
They removed the charger to save cost and waste. Who really needed another wall wart?
520@kbin.social 1 year ago
You're both talking past each other.
First, they had thunderbolt to USB A cables and a USB A charger.
Then they had thunderbolt to USB C cables and a USB C charger.
Then they were forced by the EU to swap out the thunderbolt connector with USB C on the device itself.
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
He’s claiming apple is greenwashing when they removed the charger. It removed cost and waste, it can be both green and good business.
I thought they were arguing that the move to usb c was also greenwashing, when it was the EU regulations, again to reduce waste. It is green, not greenwashing.