Comment on Driverless Cruise car runs over woman hit by another driver
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 11 months agoIt couldn’t avoid her, no. The bigger problem was that the car parked on her, I think.
Comment on Driverless Cruise car runs over woman hit by another driver
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 11 months agoIt couldn’t avoid her, no. The bigger problem was that the car parked on her, I think.
FaceDeer@kbin.social 11 months ago
"Do nothing" is usually not that bad an approach to dealing with an unknown situation. I could easily see a situation where trying to back away from the person you just hit would increase the damage.
As other comments have suggested, we should wait for the video before judging whether this was really a bad choice by the autonomous car.
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That doesn’t get any truer even if you repeat it a few more times.
Truth is that a general approach was not sufficient here. This cars programming was NOT good enough. It has made a bad decision with bad consequences.
FaceDeer@kbin.social 11 months ago
And "no it isn't" isn't a very convincing argument to the contrary.
Yes, in this particular case, the car should have moved a bit. I'm talking about the general case. What are the odds that a car happens to come to a stop with its wheel exactly on top of someone's limb, versus having that wheel finish up somewhere near the person where further movement might cause additional harm? And how can the car know which situation it's currently in?
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Wrong question.
If you want autonomous cars outside in the real world (as opposed to artificial lab and test scenarios), then they have to deal with real world situations. This situation has happened in reality. You don’t need to ask about odds anymore.
That is an engineering question. And again one of these that should have been solved before they let this car out into the real world.