Comment on US issues first ever fine for space junk to Dish Network
Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 year agoI heard they’re designed to burn up in the atmosphere. Probably not an eco-friendly move, but it beats taking a satellite to the head.
Comment on US issues first ever fine for space junk to Dish Network
Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 year agoI heard they’re designed to burn up in the atmosphere. Probably not an eco-friendly move, but it beats taking a satellite to the head.
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 year ago
Fine powder of metals strewn over a few km², there’s more coming from outer space via micrometeorites and dust. And that bit CO² in the Stratosphere…
lud@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yeah but you also have to manufacture and send up the satellites into LEO.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 year ago
Also counterintuitively, you need some fuel to deorbit, which adds payload weight at launch and requires more fuel in the first place.
For example, getting a unit of rocket fuel to the Moon requires about ten times as much at launch.
lud@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I don’t think they need much fuel in this case unless they want to be absolutely sure that they deorbit in the right place. The satellites are so small that might not even be needed.
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 year ago
Starlink’s only have fuel because of the initial lower orbit, as far as i know. Wasn’t that to test them, for radiation and so on?