Comment on A million new SpaceX satellites will destroy the night sky — for everyone on Earth
MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 day agoI can’t afford a boat, but I benefit from the goods and food that they transport.
Comment on A million new SpaceX satellites will destroy the night sky — for everyone on Earth
MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 day agoI can’t afford a boat, but I benefit from the goods and food that they transport.
4am@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Nothing is being transported via constellation satellites that wasn’t already paid for by the American people (and then not delivered on).
Why would we want our infrastructure to be the most polluting expensive version (with shit latency BTW so you can’t selfhost), in control of basically one asshole billionaire who will gleefully censor whatever he feels like, after a critical mass of dependency has been reached?
Are you glad we put our communication into such a restrictive model under a monopoly that’s cozy with a fascist government?
Stop lying to yourself and others that this was “the most efficient outcome”.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 21 hours ago
NASA has tried to build their own rockets for i think 30(?) years. Like the space shuttle. The ship was expensive. Reusability never delivered on its promise to make things cheaper, instead it made them more complicated and more expensive when NASA tried. that was the public sector, it was attempted. Then SpaceX came and somehow managed to build rockets that were both reusable and cheaper than non-reusable rockets.
So yes, that’s not an ideological adherence to capitalism or anything, just plain data, that SpaceX is simply more efficient than NASA was able to be.
MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 23 hours ago
Orbital data enters aren’t happening. A million starlinks aren’t happening. And musk will eventually die. I’m only defending a reasonable size of constellation.