Comment on Abandoned FOSS projects
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
All the FOSS offerings I can think of that are “too big to fail” have big corporate support
….
businesses don’t have that luxury. That’s why they use proprietary software.
Youre missing a few key things here.
- TONS of proprietary applications go years without work or effort
- TONS of proprietary applications/solutions get abandoned, leaving businesses and consumers to scramble for a solution.
- If the business relies on open source, they can contribute to that project.
- An open source solution also means continuity and the ability to fork when abandoned, proprietary solutions that are abandoned are just gone.
I wouldn’t put much agreement toward your argument for proprietary here, because I’ve seen (and had to deal with) proprietary solutions being abandoned with no workable solution available, especially as the current generation of proprietary solutions require a license server or other cloud-connected back end in order to work.
So when they get abandoned, its just over.
So no, this argument against open source for business has no merits IMO.
early_riser@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m not saying proprietary software doesn’t also have problems, just that FOSS has problems unique to it that are rarely acknowledged.
Everything I implement at work is open source because I don’t want to wait for a purchase approval. But I’m also practically the only one interacting with those systems, so I’m the only one who’s affected if something breaks.
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
None of the issues you’ve noted are unique to open source though.
Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Just to say, though, I feel like 99% of the software we deploy is open-source for that exact reason. Projects generally start out small, where you try to evaluate some concept. You’re not gonna spend months to go through the purchase process of some proprietary tool, if you can help it…