Comment on a VPN that is easily self-hostable and resistant to blocking?
spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoI don’t need strong censorship resistance; it just has to work in offices and hotel WiFis.
OP: “I don’t need strong censorship resistance; it just has to work in offices and hotel WiFis.”
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
Many of the prominent https VPN protocols are for evading the great firewall of China. OP had that as a requirement, so it is not an unreasonable assumption.
If you are evading less locked down firewalls, then you don’t need as stealthy VPNs.
spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Where the fuck do you get this stuff?
moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
From OP’s post, of course. If OP does not need to evade firewalls that are that aggressive, then they should have settled for a less stealthy VPN solution, as many of these HTTPS proxy solutions have performance and usability (can often only proxy TCP traffic) tradeoffs.
pr3d@eviltoast.org 3 weeks ago
I haven’t tried WG on 443/udp yet. On my last UK journey I had it on the default WG port and it was blocked a few times. Will try 443/udp @ homelab next time. Every other advanced obfuscating solution sounds pretty complicated and I’m not sure if there will be time to handle this during a journey.